Boyoung Jeong vs Elena Micic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Oct at 06:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Jeong vs E. Micic

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jeong 1 - 0 Micic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Boyoung Jeong winning 2 and Elena Micic winning 0. The last match between Boyoung Jeong and Elena Micic was at the W35 Darwin, 12-10-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Boyoung Jeong getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jeong | 1 |
| Micic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) W35 Darwin(10-12-25)
B. Jeong vs E. Micic H2H Profile
B. Jeong vs E. Micic Match Preview:
- How do their second serve performances compare? Elena Micic has a slight edge, winning 37.71% of points on her second serve compared to Boyoung Jeong's 36.63% over the last six months.
- In return games, Boyoung Jeong holds an advantage by winning 54.81% of her opponent's second serve points, slightly better than Elena Micic's 52.30%.
- When it comes to returning first serves, Elena Micic is slightly better with a win percentage of 35.59% compared to Boyoung Jeong's 33.79%.
- Under pressure, in terms of saving breakpoints, Elena Micic has a minor advantage, having saved 46.67% of breakpoints compared to Boyoung Jeong's 45.09%.
- Looking at overall performance over the past year, Boyoung Jeong has a stronger winning ratio with 57.35%, whereas Elena Micic stands at 50.00%.
- What about surface preferences? Elena Micic excels on Grass with a 60% win rate, while Boyoung Jeong prefers Hard surfaces, also with a 60% win rate.
- In terms of recent match level, Boyoung Jeong has a better win rate at lower-tier Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at 60.87%, compared to Elena Micic's 50.00% at Challengers/ITF tournaments.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Elena Micic has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 337.5, whereas Boyoung Jeong's opponents had an average rank of 387.78.
- If this match progresses to a deciding set, Elena Micic might have the upper hand, winning 60% of such sets compared to Boyoung Jeong's 47% over the last year.
Editorial Prediction (October 12, 2025, UTC):
Elena Micic demonstrates a marginally better second serve performance and a slightly superior ability to save breakpoints. Her edge extends to returning first serves more efficiently than Boyoung Jeong.
However, Boyoung Jeong has shown a stronger winning rate overall in the past year and performs slightly better in returning second serves. Her comfort on Hard surfaces is notable, mirroring Elena's success on Grass, but not applicable in this match.
Despite facing slightly tougher competition, Elena Micic has been more successful in deciding sets. Nevertheless, given Boyoung Jeong's higher overall win percentage and her advantageous second serve return results, she is more likely to secure a win in the upcoming match.
Boyoung Jeong vs Elena Micic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Jeong vs E. Micic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:25:28 | Average Match Time | 1:25:28 |
| 64% (41/64) | 1st Serve % | 66% (46/70) |
| 73% (30/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 35% (8/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 51% (36/70) | Return Points Win % | 41% (26/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Jeong Recent Matches Played
E. Micic Recent Matches Played

B. Jeong vs E. Micic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.53% (114/103) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.83% (92/89) |
| 52.56% (246/222) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.00% (206/206) |
| 51.30% (2079/1974) | Games Win/Loss | 50.16% (1870/1858) |
| 54.00% (108/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.10% (81/66) |
| 33.33% (4/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 18.18% (4/18) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 238 | Aces Total | 307 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.46 |
| 927 | Total Double Faults | 830 |
| 1:25:56 | Average Match Time | 1:26:56 |
| 396.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.56 |
| 60% (6938/11511) | 1st Serve % | 66% (7076/10790) |
| 60% (4140/6938) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4194/7076) |
| 41% (1886/4573) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1589/3714) |
| 50% (785/1570) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (641/1325) |
| 48% (5524/11612) | Return Points Win % | 46% (4906/10728) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 46.15% (24/28) | Challenger W/L | 53.95% (82/70) |
| 56.60% (90/69) | Futures W/L | 32.00% (8/17) |
| 52% (109/208) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (91/180) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 44% (11/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (17/26) |
| 45% (18/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (27/49) |
| 88% (116/102) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (88/74) |
| 12% (116/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (88/14) |
| 11% (100/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (93/18) |